Skip to main content

Wowzah! It's The Two Short Essays Assignment!

Wowzah! It's The Two Short Essays Assignment! 

Essay 1

Prewriting:

    He sits at his desk, his eyes glued to the screen. Just a few chapters, that's all he needs to read, but as he reads he finds his mind wandering... wandering... wanderi- he snaps back to the page! where was he, did he already read that sentence? that paragraph? that page? or did his eyes simply glaze over it? who knows, certainly not him.

    Not sure how I could improve my approach to reading assignments. If I try to take breaks I just end up wasting too much time. Maybe I should read it in a window with no other tabs open, to get rid of the temptation? That's all I can think of, short of getting a Ritalin prescription.

Questions:

    1: He learns that by slowly and repetitively reading, he can pick apart and discern the individual pieces of writing that add up to create a good story, which he can then use to write better, himself.

    2: I think being the slowest reader in this context is not quite literal but close to it. Being a literally slow reader would suggest that the individual letters are being read at a slow pace. Whereas here, the reading of the individual words is normal, but the time spent on each sentence, paragraph, or chapter is extended greatly by the inspection of the text.

Essay 2

Prewriting:

    He sits at his desk in an identical manner to the way he previously sat when tasked with a reading assignment. The only observable difference is that now, instead of being bored stiff, he is excited! Finally, he has the chance to be comedic! To make things interesting! Though, he can't think of an entertaining way to describe what he's currently writing, which happens to be this very assignment. A recursive rabbit-hole of a 3rd person narrator describing a man writing the same 3rd person narrator to describe the same man writing the same 3rd person narrator to describe the same man writing the-... He's gotten off-track. As he comes back from the pit of endless prose, he grapples with the desire to be creative versus the knowledge that he -for the sake of the assignment- should probably reel it in a bit.

    My takeaway from writing this is that maybe I shouldn't try to be funny in assignments, and just stick to a more serious tone. Even if I do find that thought disappointing.

Two ideas from the short essay I found important:

    1: The idea of making the writing fun/interesting. I like to think I already do that, but I feel affirmed reading it from an official essay. So I'll keep doing it!

    2: The source-heavy trick. If I end up using it, it will probably cut down a lot on the time it takes for me to write an essay. Though, on the other hand, it has the same ominous feeling as a forbidden secret technique, like necromancy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Killer Whale Was the Friends We Made Along the Way.

     1: Morality is a mostly human-made invention to categorize actions and behaviors of other humans as either desirable (good) or undesirable (bad). Morality is not a binary, obviously there's a lot of grey area, in fact, most of it is grey-area, but my larger point is that ascribing it to stuff that isn't human gets messy. Is a lion "bad" for eating an elk? Is water "good" for hydrating us? Is lightning "a douche" for turning my hotdog into ash? The answer to all of these is, probably, no.      This was a longwinded way of saying that I don't think Tilikum was the villain in this situation. Were they the victim? Broadly speaking, yes. SeaWorld, famously, is a factory for marine-mammal misery, and if the article is anything to go by, Sealand was basically the equivalent of orca hell, “If you pen killer whales in a small steel tank, you are imposing an extreme level of sensory deprivation on them,” .     The villain of this story, in my op...

Did I find THE best sources for my topic? Realistically, no.

     Here are the two sources I selected for this discussion:     1:  https://www.space.com/15830-light-speed.html     2:  https://betterexplained.com/articles/understanding-the-monty-hall-problem/      Now, let's go through the CARS for each of them.     The speed of light one doesn't fail the credibility check, but it doesn't exactly pass it, either. The author is not anonymous, and has a background in science, but it's ecology, not physics. The Monty Hall one, I think, fails the credibility check, as I could not find an author.     Both are fairly accurate, the Monty Hall one even having a minigame where you yourself play through the scenario. The light-speed one was posted only one year ago, though the Monty Hall one was posted six years ago (though, I don't think fundamental aspects of statistics tend to change over time).      Both are also reliable, being internally consistent, and spea...

Haha wow pandemics seem pretty scary, good thing one of THOSE has never happened.......

     I wouldn't exactly call dystopia a "trending" genre, they've been around for quite awhile. I've read most of hunger games, as well as one and a half books from the maze runner series. Brain scientists seem to attribute the popularity to the developing brain, specifically the rise of emotional complexity/exploration.     Looks to be about some sort of flu that wipes out practically everyone.     My best guess is that the "The bright side of the planet moves towards darkness" line connects to how dystopias are often set in the future? I have no idea what "There is too much world" could mean, it sounds like the person wants  the world to end, but that doesn't really fit with dystopia since that word has a negative connotation. If they want the world to end, and then the world ends, it would be a utopia (for them, at least.)     As I write this, I'm on page 6. My main thought right now is how bad plastic snow would be for your long-ter...