Skip to main content

Wowzah! It's The Two Short Essays Assignment!

Wowzah! It's The Two Short Essays Assignment! 

Essay 1

Prewriting:

    He sits at his desk, his eyes glued to the screen. Just a few chapters, that's all he needs to read, but as he reads he finds his mind wandering... wandering... wanderi- he snaps back to the page! where was he, did he already read that sentence? that paragraph? that page? or did his eyes simply glaze over it? who knows, certainly not him.

    Not sure how I could improve my approach to reading assignments. If I try to take breaks I just end up wasting too much time. Maybe I should read it in a window with no other tabs open, to get rid of the temptation? That's all I can think of, short of getting a Ritalin prescription.

Questions:

    1: He learns that by slowly and repetitively reading, he can pick apart and discern the individual pieces of writing that add up to create a good story, which he can then use to write better, himself.

    2: I think being the slowest reader in this context is not quite literal but close to it. Being a literally slow reader would suggest that the individual letters are being read at a slow pace. Whereas here, the reading of the individual words is normal, but the time spent on each sentence, paragraph, or chapter is extended greatly by the inspection of the text.

Essay 2

Prewriting:

    He sits at his desk in an identical manner to the way he previously sat when tasked with a reading assignment. The only observable difference is that now, instead of being bored stiff, he is excited! Finally, he has the chance to be comedic! To make things interesting! Though, he can't think of an entertaining way to describe what he's currently writing, which happens to be this very assignment. A recursive rabbit-hole of a 3rd person narrator describing a man writing the same 3rd person narrator to describe the same man writing the same 3rd person narrator to describe the same man writing the-... He's gotten off-track. As he comes back from the pit of endless prose, he grapples with the desire to be creative versus the knowledge that he -for the sake of the assignment- should probably reel it in a bit.

    My takeaway from writing this is that maybe I shouldn't try to be funny in assignments, and just stick to a more serious tone. Even if I do find that thought disappointing.

Two ideas from the short essay I found important:

    1: The idea of making the writing fun/interesting. I like to think I already do that, but I feel affirmed reading it from an official essay. So I'll keep doing it!

    2: The source-heavy trick. If I end up using it, it will probably cut down a lot on the time it takes for me to write an essay. Though, on the other hand, it has the same ominous feeling as a forbidden secret technique, like necromancy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

They're Called Cell Phones Because The Phone is of Out Hot Cell Eat The Phone

     (The title is a reference, if you don't understand, don't worry about it.)      These two articles are a bit more linked than normal, as one is a direct response to the other. Though aside from the fact that they both talk about phones and are written in English, there aren't many comparisons I can make, they differ from each other quite severely.     First, and most obviously, their stances on cellphones are direct opposites. The one titled "Have Smartphones Destroyed A Generation?" Is, shockingly (not really,) thinks that the impact smartphones have on the youths is negative overall, whereas the response, "No, Smartphones are Not Destroying a Generation" thinks that this is not the case (another shocking revelation, I know)     There are also some more minor differences in format, for example, the response is much shorter than the paper it's responding to, which I appreciate greatly because my attention span is garbage. The source...

The tale of a self-destructive reality

Long long ago, before the dawn of time and space, a being of unfathomable scale and power took its last breath, its limp body sinking through the surrounding void, veins bleeding time and body rotting into universes, but some universes were made of flesh that wasn't so decayed, that was fresh enough that it still had some of that infinite power that every primordial scavenger sought to harness, and harness they did, creating vast inter-universal empires headed by warlords wielding god-like power, who hoarded their territories like raccoons, if raccoons were so inclined to hold territory, but some raccoons are more ambitious than others, and warlords were no different, as one of them, Ygadle, had a scheme, by using their near-infinite power, they could repurpose one of their universes into a device known as the Eternity Engine, a hyperspherical construct, quadrillions of light years in diameter, with the capability of pumping the temporal blood back into the corpse from which all re...

The Real Killer Whale Was the Friends We Made Along the Way.

     1: Morality is a mostly human-made invention to categorize actions and behaviors of other humans as either desirable (good) or undesirable (bad). Morality is not a binary, obviously there's a lot of grey area, in fact, most of it is grey-area, but my larger point is that ascribing it to stuff that isn't human gets messy. Is a lion "bad" for eating an elk? Is water "good" for hydrating us? Is lightning "a douche" for turning my hotdog into ash? The answer to all of these is, probably, no.      This was a longwinded way of saying that I don't think Tilikum was the villain in this situation. Were they the victim? Broadly speaking, yes. SeaWorld, famously, is a factory for marine-mammal misery, and if the article is anything to go by, Sealand was basically the equivalent of orca hell, “If you pen killer whales in a small steel tank, you are imposing an extreme level of sensory deprivation on them,” .     The villain of this story, in my op...