Skip to main content

Did I find THE best sources for my topic? Realistically, no.

    Here are the two sources I selected for this discussion:

    1: https://www.space.com/15830-light-speed.html

    2: https://betterexplained.com/articles/understanding-the-monty-hall-problem/

    Now, let's go through the CARS for each of them.

    The speed of light one doesn't fail the credibility check, but it doesn't exactly pass it, either. The author is not anonymous, and has a background in science, but it's ecology, not physics. The Monty Hall one, I think, fails the credibility check, as I could not find an author.

    Both are fairly accurate, the Monty Hall one even having a minigame where you yourself play through the scenario. The light-speed one was posted only one year ago, though the Monty Hall one was posted six years ago (though, I don't think fundamental aspects of statistics tend to change over time).

    Both are also reliable, being internally consistent, and speaking about scientific facts that have long since been proven true, and on that point, they are also both well-supported by evidence from the larger scientific community.

    My sources help establish a "so what" by explaining aspects of math and science that would otherwise seem counterintuitive to a layperson, thus establishing an idea that intuition is not a replacement for science. It also helps spark a curiosity in the reader, a curiosity of why things are the way they are. Why is there a speed limit on the universe? Why is it better to switch doors in the Monty Hall problem?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pandemic Book Part 2: Electric Boogaloo

      I'm not sure how I'm supposed to follow the note because I can't see what passages other people picked until I submit this. -writing this as I read, I find it  mildly interesting that Jeevan was a paparazzo twice. I thought it was one solid block of his life, but nope. -Also, what kind of name is Jeevan? for the remainder of this blog I'm gonna call him Jeeves -calling it now I think Frank's gonna die or otherwise be separated from Jeeves. -"his hands ached from compressing Arthur's unwilling heart" is a pretty neat line, good contender for the line I'll discuss. -when Jeeves's phone rang and he said "hua" I thought that was an exclamation of surprise, like "HUH?!" -I'm disappointed to find out Arthur wasn't patient zero, makes him less interesting to me, and it also makes the original "and this is when it happened" line I praised very dull in hindsight. Because even if "it" didn't happe...
Post a Comment
Read more

I wonder what Arthur would think of his son.

"Clark realized he had tears on his face. Why, in his life of frequent travel, had he never recognized the beauty of flight?" (247) Good concise line about the classic lesson of not realizing what you had until it's gone. "On the clearest nights the stars were a cloud of light across the breadth of the sky, extravagant in their multitudes. When Clark first noticed this, he wondered if he was possibly hallucinating." (251) which I interpret as a darkly humorous joke about how normalized light pollution is in modern society. 1: Clark has become a museum curator. I don't remember if it was established before that he was gay, but that's neat. It feels like Jeeves has become more desensitized/cynical, but that could just be me. He is basically a doctor, and is married. Physically, people survive by setting up primitive infrastructure: gardens, fires, hunting groups, scavenger groups, etc. Mentally, some people survive by not thinking about what they lost, som...
Post a Comment
Read more

Viruses and Plastic (and Vladivir)

Part 1:  1:      " Where am I? What's happening? "      "Hello Vladivir. To answer your first question, you're nowhere, existing only in the minds eye of the reader. To answer your second, you have been called into existence as a hypothetical narrative being, for the purposes of a college writing assignment. Shall we begin?"      "...Sure?"      "Very good then. You see, Vladivir, I have stumbled upon an issue that bothers me. Viruses do not fall under our current definition of 'alive', I find this odd considering they do various activities one might associated with something living, they mutate, they reproduce, they even evolve and adapt to their environments. The reason they aren't considered alive is that they do not grow, they cannot reproduce on their own (requiring a host-cell to do it for them), and they do not produce or use their own energy (they mooch off of the host cell's), and all of those things are required ...
Post a Comment
Read more